Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.contributor.authorJobin, Marilou
dc.contributor.authorVisschers, Vivianne
dc.contributor.authorvan Vliet, Oscar, P.R.
dc.contributor.authorArvai, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorSiegrist, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-13T07:35:28Z
dc.date.available2019-02-13T07:35:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11654/27386
dc.description.abstractThe energy transition in Switzerland, as in many other countries, aims to increase the proportion of electricity produced using renewable energy technologies. In this context, governmental agencies and other institutions have attempted to communicate the implications of (domestic) electricity systems through the use of web-based and interactive decision support systems (DSSs). Studies show that, when no additional information is provided, preferences concerning the future electricity mix are mainly driven by the affective reactions that energy technologies evoke. A question remains, however, regarding how people engage with the information provided in a DSS, as well as whether such information is influential in terms of shaping people’s choices. We asked our participants to build an electricity portfolio using a DSS, which modeled the Swiss electricity system. The participants’ political orientation and their affective reactions to different energy technologies guided their information search, as well as the choice of energy technologies within their portfolio. The attention paid to the information provided was not directly related to the participants’ portfolio choices. The selective processing of information, which was based on the participants’ prior attitudes, suggests that they target information they are already familiar with in the DSS. However, this also illustrates a caveat previously identified in motivated political reasoning, since selective information processing, together with the tendency to disconfirm information that is incongruent with prior beliefs, can lead to the polarization of previously held views. As the information provided through the DSS we tested was unable to change the participants’ affective-cognitive evaluation of energy technologies, its use should be carefully considered in light of the possible effects of consolidating existing beliefs.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Research & Social Science
dc.accessRightsAnonymous
dc.subject.ddc334 - Natürliche Ressourcen, Energie und Umweltde
dc.subject.ddc150 - Psychologiede
dc.titleAffect or information? Examining drivers of public preferences of future energy portfolios in Switzerland
dc.type01 - Zeitschriftenartikel, Journalartikel oder Magazin
dc.volume52
dc.audienceScience
fhnw.publicationStatePublished
fhnw.ReviewTypeAnonymous ex ante peer review of a complete publication
fhnw.InventedHereYes
fhnw.PublishedSwitzerlandYes
fhnw.pagination20-29
fhnw.IsStudentsWorkno
fhnw.publicationOnlineJa


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

DateienGrösseFormatAnzeige

Zu diesem Eintrag gibt es keine Dateien.

Der Eintrag erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige